Gendered Social Norms & Laws: Shaping Gender Equality
Authors: Alev Gurbuz Cuneo, Ana Maria Tribin
Abstract: Economic outcomes for women are shaped by a combination of social norms, laws, and policies that interact to influence behavior and access to economic opportunities in their economies. While laws are essential for gender equality, their effectiveness is often moderated by societal attitudes. The relationship between gendered social norms and laws in a society is deeply interconnected and often endogenous. In this paper, we analyze the relationship between gender norms and laws using available global data. For the legal aspect, we benefit from the Women, Business and the Law (WBL) panel dataset that measures the legal frameworks across 190 economies providing protections or benefits for women. For the gendered social norms, we use data from multiple sources, including the World Values Survey (WVS), Gallup World Poll, and Facebook’s Global Gender Gap Insights Survey, to assess societal attitudes toward gender roles and how these norms interact with legal frameworks. The analysis attempts to examine how gender norms and legal reforms interact, providing insights into how social norms may either reinforce or undermine the rights provided by legal protections to improve gender equality in economies. The findings suggest that legal reforms aimed at enhancing gender equality are significantly linked with the prevalence of public opinion about women’s roles in various spheres of life, including work, politics, and the home. The significant correlations are in the expected direction/sign, and the magnitude and strength vary among different areas of gender norms around (i) women’s working, (ii) household dynamics, (iii) women’s rights across different legal areas that impact women’s participation in labor force, as captured in the WBL. Results are robust to inclusion of different control variables in the regressions.
Do women govern differently? Evidence from Mexican local politics
Authors: Laura Alicia Aquino Arriaga, John Hassett
Abstract: Mexico approved a major constitutional reform in 2014 which resulted in a gender parity requirement at the municipal executive level. We exploit time and spatial variation to analyze the extent to which this reform impacted the number of female municipal presidents elected and other policy outcomes. Using a differences-in-differences methodology, we show that parity rules had immediate significant positive effects on the gender makeup of municipal executives; our further analyses demonstrate that the effects are lasting, but full parity is not reached due in part to party strategizing. We also explore whether this new legal environment affected various measures of municipal spending and tax collection. We find that the parity rules are associated with more fiscally conservative municipal budgeting. This is consistent with (a) the entry of fiscally conservative women after the introduction of the gender parity rules and/or (b) a "penalty" in funds disbursement for female executives. Next steps will analyze the impact of this reform on gender initiatives, and the gender composition of the public-sector labor force.
Municipal-level Gender Norms: Measurement and Effects on Women in Politics
Authors: Carrer Luisa, Lorenzo De Masi
Abstract: We study the implications of traditional gender norms for legislators' engagement with women's issues. We leverage rich data from Facebook on the popularity of gender-related interests (processed using machine learning algorithms) to develop a granular Gender Norms Index (GNI) at the municipal level within Italy, a geographical resolution that would otherwise be unavailable. After validating our index, we leverage this local variation in norms to isolate their impact on legislators' policy activity in the Italian Parliament. We show that while female legislators generally sponsor more gender-related bills than their male counterparts, their engagement is substantially smaller if they were born in a gender-conservative town. This result persists even when comparing legislators within the same party, constituency or with similar characteristics. The absence of such a systematic impact on non-gender legislation further reinforces the causal interpretation of our estimates. Supplementary evidence on voting behavior suggests that traditional gender norms also negatively affect the passage of pro-equality legislation. Overall, our findings highlight the importance of social norms and sexist culture in lawmaking, thereby slowing down reform for the expansion of women's rights.
Political power and the influence of minorities: theory and evidence from Italy
Authors: Righetto Giovanni, Paolo Vanin
Abstract: In this paper, we analyze the relationship between minority and majority in politics, and how it can influence policy outcomes and potential conflict between parties. In particular, we focus on the consequences of a sudden increase in the political power of a minority (e.g. female politicians after a gender quota), and its potential effects on the relationship with the long-standing majority. We first present a theoretical model describing the possible consequences of such an increase in a minority’s political power and show how it can increase difficulties in reaching a compromise on policy outcomes between parties. In the case of a high increase in minority’s power, its demands in terms of policy outcomes increase and make the compromise costlier for the majority, which might
prefer to engage in conflict. Furthermore, we empirically test these implications by exploiting the introduction in 2012 of a gender quota in Italian local elections. By means of a Difference-in-Discontinuity strategy, we show how the generated increase in female politicians had heterogeneous effects on the level of funding for daycare, based on its differential effects on the share of post-quota women councillors. For high shares of female councillors, a decrease in expenditure for day care was observed with respect to control municipalities, while in municipalities with low shares the quota was followed by a relative increase in funding for day care.